A reference-content update starts with a change list. Record which entry you want to change, why, and the source supporting the new wording. One log helps preserve meaning across languages and verify the result after publication.
Separate editing access from editorial work
On 11 November 2026, the eoASSIST pricing page described text editing within Author. We did not test the post-purchase editor. Clarify the editable sections, languages, saving process and restoration of earlier versions before starting.
The following is a preparation workflow, not a guide to editor buttons. You can keep it in a regular spreadsheet before obtaining access.
The eoASSIST oil reference
Search for oils by name and open their reference entries.
Use one log row per change
| Field | Record |
|---|---|
| Material | Title, language and entry URL or identifier |
| Reason | Error, outdated information or wording clarification |
| Before / after | The exact original and proposed passage |
| Basis | Source, date and scope |
| Review | Fact reviewer and the result visible to the reader |
Prepare a reviewable revision
Start with one small passage. Keep the original separately and check botanical names, plant parts and links. A general library link does not establish a particular claim. Treatment claims, doses and advice for specific groups require qualified review. This worksheet does not replace it.
For the second language, compare numbers, names and qualifications. Finish the meaning before polishing the layout so a translation error cannot hide behind tidy formatting.
Check the reader-facing result
Compare the published passage with the approved revision. Open its links and check source notes and phone wrapping. Record what actually happened: saved, published, rejected or awaiting correction. Pressing a button alone does not prove visitors can see the new version.
Ask support about access. Use the source-checking guide when reviewing the factual basis.
The eoASSIST oil reference
Search for oils by name and open their reference entries.